Osage vs Jamaican Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Osage
Jamaican
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Osage
Jamaicans
17.8%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Jamaican Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,799,685 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.154 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,984,086 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.240 and weighted average of 17.9%, a difference of 0.54%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Jamaican |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 5.6% |
| Maximum | 25.8% | 23.5% |
| Range | 22.2% | 17.9% |
| Mean | 15.1% | 16.8% |
| Median | 16.2% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 18.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Jamaicans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Spanish American Indian (17.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Guatemalan (17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Tongan (17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Panamanian (17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and Mongolian (17.7%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Bangladesh (17.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (17.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Paiute (17.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Thailand (17.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Mexican (17.8%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 2.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Mongolians | 2.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Guatemalans | 2.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Tongans | 2.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Panamanians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Osage | 2.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Spanish American Indians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 1.8 /100 | #236 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Cheyenne | 1.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Cajuns | 1.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Mexicans | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Paiute | 1.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.0 /100 | #243 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Jamaicans | 0.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 0.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Samoans | 0.7 /100 | #247 | Tragic 17.9% |
| French American Indians | 0.7 /100 | #248 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #249 | Tragic 17.9% |