Norwegian vs Immigrants from Romania Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Norwegian
Immigrants from Romania
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Norwegians
Immigrants from Romania
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
93.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Immigrants from Romania Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,951,359 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.453 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,972,629 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | Immigrants from Romania |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.77% |
Maximum | 18.9% | 16.3% |
Range | 17.7% | 15.5% |
Mean | 6.8% | 6.9% |
Median | 6.1% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.3% | 7.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Immigrants from Romania by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Kenya (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from South America (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |