Nicaraguan vs Yugoslavian Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Nicaraguan
Yugoslavian
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Nicaraguans
Yugoslavians
17.0%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
93.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
71.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nicaraguan vs Yugoslavian Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,693,430 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.007 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,698,583 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.057 and weighted average of 17.2%, a difference of 1.2%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nicaraguan | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 30.4% | 26.1% |
| Range | 26.9% | 23.2% |
| Mean | 16.2% | 15.9% |
| Median | 16.2% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.4% | 14.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.4% | 17.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 4.5% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Nicaraguans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uruguay (17.0%, a difference of 0.010%), European (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (17.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Germany (17.0%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | China | 94.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 94.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Portuguese | 94.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Turks | 94.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Scandinavians | 94.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Europeans | 93.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Nicaraguans | 93.0 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 92.9 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 91.7 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Lebanese | 91.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Switzerland (17.2%, a difference of 0.0%), American (17.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Australian (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Armenian (17.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
| Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
| Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
| Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
| Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 63.5 /100 | #167 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 62.5 /100 | #168 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 61.8 /100 | #169 | Good 17.2% |