Maltese vs Chinese Vision Disability
COMPARE
Maltese
Chinese
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Maltese
Chinese
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Chinese Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,445,167 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,588 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 1.7%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Maltese | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.070% | 0.40% |
Maximum | 6.1% | 6.4% |
Range | 6.0% | 6.0% |
Mean | 2.1% | 2.3% |
Median | 1.9% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 1.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 2.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 0.78% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 1.00% |
Demographics Similar to Maltese and Chinese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Immigrants from Argentina (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Russian (2.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.0%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Latvia (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Western Asia (2.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Poland (2.0%, a difference of 0.26%), Soviet Union (2.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Lithuanian (2.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Maltese | 98.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Russians | 98.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 98.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | France | 98.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Palestinians | 98.3 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Paraguayans | 98.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Lithuanians | 97.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Soviet Union | 97.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 97.5 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Chinese | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.0% |