Immigrants from Zaire vs Immigrants from Grenada Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zaire
Immigrants from Grenada
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Zaire
Immigrants from Grenada
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
18.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
202nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
23.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zaire vs Immigrants from Grenada Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,249,797 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.836 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,180,438 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 0.49%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zaire | Immigrants from Grenada |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.16% |
Maximum | 14.0% | 5.1% |
Range | 12.9% | 4.9% |
Mean | 2.6% | 2.3% |
Median | 2.1% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.61% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Grenada by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zaire are Slovak (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Dutch (2.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Guyana (2.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Samoan (2.2%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Grenada are Immigrants (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Barbados (2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Czechoslovakian (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and British (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Salvadorans | 27.4 /100 | #189 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 26.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 2.2% |
Canadians | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.2% |
Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |
British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% |
Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 13.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 2.2% |