Immigrants from Sweden vs Zimbabwean Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sweden
Zimbabwean
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Sweden
Zimbabweans
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sweden vs Zimbabwean Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,722,765 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.751 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,187,176 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.539 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 3.0%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sweden | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.83% |
| Maximum | 25.9% | 17.3% |
| Range | 24.5% | 16.5% |
| Mean | 5.9% | 5.5% |
| Median | 5.4% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sweden and Zimbabweans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sweden are Immigrants from Indonesia (5.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Paraguayan (5.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Argentinean (5.5%, a difference of 0.82%), Mongolian (5.5%, a difference of 0.90%), and Venezuelan (5.5%, a difference of 0.98%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Cambodian (5.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Iran (5.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Turkey (5.4%, a difference of 0.96%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.6% |