Immigrants from South America vs Brazilian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from South America
Brazilian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from South America
Brazilians
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
78.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South America vs Brazilian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,101,818 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.341 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,867,149 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 9.4%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South America | Brazilian |
Minimum | 0.40% | 0.82% |
Maximum | 6.4% | 7.3% |
Range | 6.0% | 6.5% |
Mean | 2.4% | 3.1% |
Median | 2.4% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 3.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.61% | 0.65% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.73% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.73% | 1.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South America by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South America are Immigrants from Singapore (2.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Israel (2.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Paraguayan (2.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (2.7%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Dominica (2.6%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
West Indians | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Senegalese | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Nigerians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Venezuelans | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Paraguayans | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Jamaicans | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Ethiopians | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |