Immigrants from Japan vs Cherokee Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Japan
Cherokee
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Japan
Cherokee
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
66.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Japan vs Cherokee Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,074,925 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.411 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,388,222 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218 and weighted average of 4.2%, a difference of 42.6%.
![Immigrants from Japan vs Cherokee Hearing Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/hearing-disability/immigrants-from-japan-vs-cherokee-hearing-disability-chart.webp)
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Japan | Cherokee |
Minimum | 0.47% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 17.2% | 21.8% |
Range | 16.8% | 19.8% |
Mean | 4.2% | 7.0% |
Median | 3.1% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.6% | 8.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 2.9% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Australia (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Central America (3.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (3.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 3.0% |
Arabs | 57.6 /100 | #169 | Average 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Native/Alaskan (4.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Houma (4.2%, a difference of 0.68%), Crow (4.2%, a difference of 0.94%), Tohono O'odham (4.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and Dutch West Indian (4.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 4.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 4.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |