Immigrants from Italy vs Immigrants from Lithuania Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Italy
Immigrants from Lithuania
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Italy
Immigrants from Lithuania
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
41.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
182nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Italy vs Immigrants from Lithuania Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,155,277 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.536 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,714,489 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 3.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Italy | Immigrants from Lithuania |
Minimum | 1.1% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 23.9% | 5.7% |
Range | 22.8% | 3.5% |
Mean | 5.3% | 3.3% |
Median | 3.3% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 3.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 0.78% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 0.86% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 0.85% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Immigrants from Belgium (3.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Sweden (3.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Bulgarian (3.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Moldova (3.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Ireland (3.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Romania | 48.4 /100 | #175 | Average 3.0% |
Panamanians | 47.0 /100 | #176 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 46.4 /100 | #177 | Average 3.0% |
Japanese | 46.0 /100 | #178 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 43.1 /100 | #179 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 42.4 /100 | #180 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 41.5 /100 | #181 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 41.1 /100 | #182 | Average 3.0% |
Bulgarians | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 37.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 35.3 /100 | #185 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 34.9 /100 | #186 | Fair 3.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 34.7 /100 | #187 | Fair 3.0% |
Mexican American Indians | 34.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 3.0% |
Africans | 32.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |