Immigrants from Israel vs Blackfeet Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Blackfeet
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Blackfeet
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Blackfeet Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,002,102 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,475,903 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.202 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 32.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Blackfeet |
Minimum | 0.69% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 24.6% | 23.4% |
Range | 24.0% | 20.7% |
Mean | 5.8% | 10.1% |
Median | 5.1% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 11.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Immigrants from Yemen (7.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Shoshone (7.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Delaware (7.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (7.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Central American Indian (7.2%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 7.1% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 7.2% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 7.2% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 7.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 7.3% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 7.4% |