Immigrants from Germany vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Germany
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Germany
Sub-Saharan Africans
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Germany vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,741,390 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Germany and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.961 and weighted average of 3.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 20.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Germany | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 2.3% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 11.9% |
Range | 97.7% | 10.6% |
Mean | 14.3% | 3.5% |
Median | 7.5% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.1% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.6% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.3% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Germany by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Germany are British (3.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Belgian (3.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Canada (3.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from North America (3.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and Hawaiian (3.5%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Yaqui | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 3.4% |
Northern Europeans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 3.4% |
Slovenes | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 3.5% |
Portuguese | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 3.5% |
Hawaiians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 3.5% |
Immigrants | North America | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 3.5% |
Immigrants | Canada | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 3.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 3.5% |
British | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 3.5% |
Belgians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 3.5% |
Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.5% |
Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.5% |
Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.5% |
Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% |
Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |