Immigrants from Canada vs Swiss Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Canada
Swiss
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Canada
Swiss
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Canada vs Swiss Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,215,388 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.792 and weighted average of 3.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,835,494 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206 and weighted average of 3.5%, a difference of 2.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Canada | Swiss |
Minimum | 0.49% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 60.0% | 25.0% |
Range | 59.5% | 24.5% |
Mean | 10.2% | 5.1% |
Median | 7.0% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 4.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Canada and Swiss by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Canada are Immigrants from North America (3.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Hawaiian (3.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Portuguese (3.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Germany (3.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and British (3.5%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Czechoslovakian (3.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (3.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Danish (3.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Fijian (3.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and Czech (3.5%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Northern Europeans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 3.4% |
Slovenes | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 3.5% |
Portuguese | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 3.5% |
Hawaiians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 3.5% |
Immigrants | North America | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 3.5% |
Immigrants | Canada | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 3.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 3.5% |
British | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 3.5% |
Belgians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 3.5% |
Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.5% |
Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.5% |
Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.5% |
Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% |
Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.5% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.5% |
Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.6% |
Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.6% |
Basques | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.6% |