Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Zimbabwean Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Zimbabwean
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Zimbabweans
11.0%
DISABILITY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Zimbabwean Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,681,274 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.007 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,588 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.95%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bangladesh | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 2.2% | 4.5% |
Maximum | 18.1% | 21.8% |
Range | 15.9% | 17.3% |
Mean | 10.9% | 11.1% |
Median | 10.8% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 11.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh and Zimbabweans by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Immigrants from Serbia (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Chile (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Vietnam (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Sierra Leonean (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Bulgaria (10.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Colombia (10.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eritrea (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from South America (10.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Salvadorans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 99.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bulgarians | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Laotians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Sri Lankans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | France | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.0% |