Immigrants from Australia vs Immigrants from Belarus Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Immigrants from Belarus
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Immigrants from Belarus
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
69.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Immigrants from Belarus Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,168,976 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,188,321 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 10.9%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Immigrants from Belarus |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.54% |
Maximum | 15.9% | 19.6% |
Range | 14.9% | 19.0% |
Mean | 6.8% | 6.2% |
Median | 5.8% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 3.2% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Pakistan (5.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Venezuela (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Turkey (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Nigerian (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |