Hmong vs Danish Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Hmong
Danish
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Hmong
Danes
3.4%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hmong vs Danish Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,680,511 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 3.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,961,057 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 3.6%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hmong | Danish |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 0.96% |
| Maximum | 8.3% | 49.1% |
| Range | 6.5% | 48.2% |
| Mean | 3.7% | 7.7% |
| Median | 3.3% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.5% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Hmong and Danes by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Yaqui (3.4%, a difference of 0.45%), Northern European (3.4%, a difference of 0.52%), Slovene (3.5%, a difference of 0.76%), Portuguese (3.5%, a difference of 0.83%), and Hawaiian (3.5%, a difference of 0.87%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Czechoslovakian (3.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Swiss (3.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Puerto Rican (3.5%, a difference of 0.64%), Fijian (3.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and Czech (3.5%, a difference of 0.98%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Yaqui | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Slovenes | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Portuguese | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Hawaiians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Immigrants | North America | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 3.5% |
| British | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Belgians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.6% |