Czech vs Immigrants from Philippines Vision Disability
COMPARE
Czech
Immigrants from Philippines
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Czechs
Immigrants from Philippines
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
86.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
91.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Immigrants from Philippines Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,953,128 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,744,203 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.84%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Immigrants from Philippines |
Minimum | 0.36% | 0.22% |
Maximum | 10.1% | 7.1% |
Range | 9.8% | 6.9% |
Mean | 2.8% | 2.2% |
Median | 2.4% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 2.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 0.59% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.2% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Immigrants from Philippines by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (2.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Vietnamese (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Venezuelan (2.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Syrian (2.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and New Zealander (2.1%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Immigrants from Uganda (2.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Polish (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Scotland (2.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (2.1%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 88.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 88.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.1% |
New Zealanders | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.1% |
Syrians | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.1% |
Venezuelans | 87.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.1% |
Vietnamese | 86.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.1% |
Czechs | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 86.3 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.1% |