Czech vs French American Indian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Czech
French American Indian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Czechs
French American Indians
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs French American Indian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,559,350 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.203 and weighted average of 3.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,957,139 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.095 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 2.4%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | French American Indian |
| Minimum | 0.98% | 0.83% |
| Maximum | 13.6% | 14.0% |
| Range | 12.6% | 13.1% |
| Mean | 4.9% | 4.7% |
| Median | 4.3% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and French American Indians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are European (3.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Fijian (3.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Puerto Rican (3.5%, a difference of 0.33%), Ute (3.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Swiss (3.5%, a difference of 0.66%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Scandinavian (3.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Slovak (3.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Swedish (3.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Basque (3.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Blackfeet (3.6%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| British | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Belgians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Basques | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.6% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |