Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Disability Age Over 75

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,266,748 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.391 and weighted average of 46.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,852,473 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.172 and weighted average of 46.4%, a difference of 0.37%.

Disability Age Over 75 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Czechoslovakian	Immigrants from Malaysia
Minimum	8.3%	17.5%
Maximum	100.0%	70.6%
Range	91.7%	53.1%
Mean	57.3%	45.6%
Median	49.4%	45.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	44.1%	41.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	69.6%	49.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	25.5%	8.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	23.7%	9.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	23.5%	9.0%

Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Immigrants from Malaysia by Disability Age Over 75

In terms of disability age over 75, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Canadian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nepal (46.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Hungarian (46.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Indian (Asian) (46.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and British (46.5%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Ukrainian (46.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Israeli (46.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cameroon (46.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Kuwait (46.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (46.4%, a difference of 0.090%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age Over 75
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	97.7 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 46.3%
Mongolians	97.7 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 46.3%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	97.1 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 46.4%
Ukrainians	97.1 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 46.4%
Israelis	97.0 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 46.4%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	96.9 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 46.4%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	96.8 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 46.4%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	96.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 46.4%
Brazilians	96.6 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 46.5%
Chileans	96.4 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 46.5%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	96.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 46.5%
Immigrants \| Chile	96.4 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 46.5%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	96.1 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 46.5%
Irish	96.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 46.5%
Dutch	95.9 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 46.5%
British	95.7 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 46.5%
Indians (Asian)	95.7 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 46.5%
Hungarians	95.3 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 46.5%
Czechoslovakians	94.7 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 46.6%
Canadians	94.4 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 46.6%
Immigrants \| Nepal	94.1 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 46.6%