Creek vs Yuman Disability
COMPARE
Creek
Yuman
Disability
Disability Comparison
Creek
Yuman
15.6%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Yuman Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,460,797 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,663,643 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yuman and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 6.7%.
![Creek vs Yuman Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/disability/creek-vs-yuman-disability-chart.webp)
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Yuman |
Minimum | 8.6% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 35.3% | 37.0% |
Range | 26.7% | 33.4% |
Mean | 20.8% | 18.4% |
Median | 20.2% | 18.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.4% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.5% | 23.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 11.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Yuman by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Kiowa (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Lumbee (15.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Colville (15.8%, a difference of 1.2%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Cajun (14.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Tohono O'odham (14.8%, a difference of 1.0%), Pueblo (14.4%, a difference of 1.2%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.2% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.6% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.1% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.1% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 17.1% |