Chippewa vs Immigrants from Oceania Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from Oceania
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from Oceania
4.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
6.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Oceania Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,037,759 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011 and weighted average of 4.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,402,457 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 25.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 0.81% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 17.9% | 7.9% |
Range | 17.1% | 6.5% |
Mean | 6.1% | 4.0% |
Median | 5.7% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 4.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 1.6% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Cheyenne (4.0%, a difference of 0.65%), Shoshone (4.0%, a difference of 0.81%), Comanche (4.0%, a difference of 0.82%), Spanish American (4.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and Puget Sound Salish (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 3.9% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 3.9% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 3.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 3.9% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 4.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 4.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 4.0% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 4.0% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 4.0% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 4.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 4.1% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 4.1% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 4.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 4.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |