Chippewa vs French American Indian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Chippewa
French American Indian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Chippewa
French American Indians
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.5%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs French American Indian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,949,512 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,938,190 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 2.5%, a difference of 1.3%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | French American Indian |
Minimum | 0.77% | 0.57% |
Maximum | 8.4% | 20.6% |
Range | 7.6% | 20.0% |
Mean | 3.1% | 3.8% |
Median | 2.7% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 4.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and French American Indians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Scotch-Irish (2.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Bahamian (2.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Spanish (2.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Nepalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Latin America (2.4%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Honduran (2.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Sioux (2.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Central America (2.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Yakama (2.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and Nonimmigrants (2.5%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 2.4% |
Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 2.4% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 2.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 2.4% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 2.4% |
Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 2.4% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 2.4% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 2.4% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 2.5% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 2.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 2.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 2.5% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 2.5% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 2.5% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 2.5% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 2.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 2.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 2.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 2.5% |