Cambodian vs Argentinean Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Cambodian
Argentinean
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Cambodians
Argentineans
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cambodian vs Argentinean Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,504,705 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 297,088,064 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.221 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 1.9%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cambodian | Argentinean |
| Minimum | 0.17% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 16.9% | 12.8% |
| Range | 16.7% | 11.5% |
| Mean | 5.7% | 5.1% |
| Median | 5.4% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.9% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Cambodians and Argentineans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cambodians are Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Iran (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Turkey (5.4%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Mongolian (5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Venezuelan (5.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.50%), Paraguayan (5.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and Turkish (5.5%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.6% |