Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Chile Female Disability
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Chile
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Chile
11.5%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Chile Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,486,745 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,627,850 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.804 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 0.21%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Immigrants from Chile |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 5.3% |
| Maximum | 28.3% | 46.7% |
| Range | 26.9% | 41.4% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 12.2% |
| Median | 11.2% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Immigrants from Chile by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Switzerland (11.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Chilean (11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Lebanon (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Eritrea (11.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (11.5%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Colombian (11.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ireland (11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Vietnam (11.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Chilean (11.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Sri Lankans | 99.9 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.9 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Salvadorans | 99.8 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Colombians | 99.8 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 99.8 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Chileans | 99.8 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.8 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.7 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.6% |