Austrian vs Polish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Austrian
Polish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Austrians
Poles
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
44.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Austrian vs Polish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,962,555 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.434 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,051,234 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Austrian | Polish |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 68.4% | 47.7% |
| Range | 66.4% | 45.5% |
| Mean | 12.4% | 9.1% |
| Median | 7.5% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.5% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Austrians and Poles by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Austrians are Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Swiss (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Thailand (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |