Asian vs Immigrants from Pakistan Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Asian
Immigrants from Pakistan
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Asians
Immigrants from Pakistan
9.4%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Asian vs Immigrants from Pakistan Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 549,994,664 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.785 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,767,182 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 1.2%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Asian | Immigrants from Pakistan |
Minimum | 1.3% | 3.9% |
Maximum | 16.7% | 25.6% |
Range | 15.4% | 21.7% |
Mean | 7.6% | 9.9% |
Median | 7.5% | 9.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 10.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Asians and Immigrants from Pakistan by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Argentinean (9.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Cypriot (9.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Okinawan (9.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Venezuelan (9.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Argentina (9.3%, a difference of 0.69%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Pakistan are Immigrants from Asia (9.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (9.5%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Ireland (9.5%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Japan (9.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and Venezuelan (9.4%, a difference of 0.89%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Soviet Union | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Argentineans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.7% |