Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Chickasaw
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,963,262 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.068. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 3.5 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $77,929, a difference of 64.4%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $70,005, a difference of 59.3%), and per capita income ($56,709 compared to $36,475, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.4%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $53,732, a difference of 33.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $44,763, a difference of 38.7%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $56,709 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $131,067 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $111,519 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $59,433 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $70,146 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $49,818 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $62,083 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $128,140 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $127,500 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $71,567 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.5% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 75.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 64.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.6%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.5% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.5% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.4% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 54.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.18%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.4% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 25.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.4% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 30.5% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.6% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 53.9%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 50.2%), and single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (66.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.1% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.5% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.6% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.9% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 23.6% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 43.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.3% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.7% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.6% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.2% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 90.7%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 83.8%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 79.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.10%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.94%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.3% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.0% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.2% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 96.5%), disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 83.8%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 76.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.2%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 15.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.6%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.95% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 19.9% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |