Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,871,481 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.162. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.061% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 60.9 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $87,751, a difference of 46.0%), per capita income ($56,709 compared to $39,372, a difference of 44.0%), and median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $49,215, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 8.9%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $53,275, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $54,474, a difference of 31.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 77.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 53.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.7%), single father poverty (14.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 11.6%), and single male poverty (10.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 31.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 55.3%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 49.7%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.36, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 85.0%), master's degree (20.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 64.1%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 62.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.9%).