Apache vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Apache
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Apache
Chickasaw
1,423
SOCIAL INDEX
11.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
309th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Apache Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,851,843 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Apache communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.226. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Apache within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Apache corresponds to a decrease of 22.6 Chickasaw.
Apache vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Apache and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 10.6%), householder income under 25 years ($49,395 compared to $44,763, a difference of 10.3%), and per capita income ($34,886 compared to $36,475, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,184 compared to $82,193, a difference of 0.010%), median earnings ($40,388 compared to $40,672, a difference of 0.70%), and median family income ($84,451 compared to $85,356, a difference of 1.1%).
Income Metric | Apache | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $34,886 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,451 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,927 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,388 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,429 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,895 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,395 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,260 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,184 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,668 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.5% | Tragic 27.2% |
Apache vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Apache and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 54.6%), receiving food stamps (18.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 39.6%), and family poverty (14.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (27.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.5%), single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 7.5%).
Poverty Metric | Apache | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 20.1% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 25.0% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 23.8% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 23.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.7% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.6% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.9% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 13.1% |
Apache vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Apache and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 70.8%), male unemployment (8.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 66.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (7.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 65.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Apache | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 8.6% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.6% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 9.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.9% | Good 5.4% |
Apache vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Apache and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (77.9% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.7% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Apache | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 60.7% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 73.7% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.0% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 79.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 77.9% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Tragic 79.0% |
Apache vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Apache and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.9%), births to unmarried women (39.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.7%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (66.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Apache | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.0% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.9% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.46 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 39.9% | Tragic 36.3% |
Apache vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Apache and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.92%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 4.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Apache | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.1% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.1% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Apache vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Apache and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 22.3%), bachelor's degree (28.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and associate's degree (36.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
Education Level Metric | Apache | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Good 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Average 97.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Average 97.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.3% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 58.0% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.8% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.2% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.3% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Apache vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Apache and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 16.8%), female disability (13.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and disability (13.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.71%), disability age 65 to 74 (29.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age over 75 (53.6% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 4.7%).
Disability Metric | Apache | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.0% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 29.7% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 53.6% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.9% |