Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Moroccan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,405,110 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Moroccans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 20.0 Moroccans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $96,117, a difference of 33.3%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $86,468, a difference of 29.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($127,500 compared to $100,138, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 6.5%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $53,256, a difference of 16.6%), and median female earnings ($49,818 compared to $41,872, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 46.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 45.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 17.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.1%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 34.9%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (66.1% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.9%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 29.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 37.9%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 29.5%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.070%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.45%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 34.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 33.8%), and disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.6%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.3%).