Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Bahamas Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,520,022 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Immigrants from Bahamas. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 17.8 Immigrants from Bahamas.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $76,910, a difference of 66.6%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $71,349, a difference of 56.3%), and median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $45,176, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 21.2%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $53,174, a difference of 34.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $45,793, a difference of 35.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 82.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 73.9%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 73.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 12.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 66.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 40.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 70.2%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 65.2%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.28%), family households (66.1% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.3%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 0.20%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 84.1%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 69.3%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 58.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.32%), 11th grade (92.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 43.8%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.6%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.8%).