Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Laotian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Laotians

Good
Good
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Laotian Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,273,731 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.385. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.070% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 70.2 Laotians.
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Laotian Communities

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Laotian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $104,993, a difference of 22.1%), per capita income ($56,709 compared to $47,041, a difference of 20.5%), and median female earnings ($49,818 compared to $42,133, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.3%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $66,306, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $54,369, a difference of 14.2%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Laotian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Hong KongLaotian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$56,709
Exceptional
$47,041
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$131,067
Exceptional
$112,859
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$111,519
Exceptional
$94,990
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,433
Exceptional
$50,343
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$70,146
Exceptional
$59,351
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,818
Exceptional
$42,133
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$62,083
Exceptional
$54,369
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,140
Exceptional
$104,993
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$127,500
Exceptional
$111,051
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,567
Exceptional
$66,306
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.5%
Poor
26.4%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Laotian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 18.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 17.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.20%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.4%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Laotian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Hong KongLaotian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.5%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
14.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.4%
Exceptional
27.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Good
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Fair
12.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.0%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Laotian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.68%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Laotian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Hong KongLaotian
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Laotian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.92%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Laotian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Hong KongLaotian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.4%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.5%
Tragic
34.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.6%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Poor
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Good
82.9%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Laotian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.7%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and single mother households (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.010%), family households (66.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.56%), and married-couple households (49.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Laotian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Hong KongLaotian
Family Households
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
65.8%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.6%
Exceptional
28.5%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Laotian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 24.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.3%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongLaotian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Exceptional
9.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
58.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.2%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Laotian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.2%), no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.6%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.34%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Laotian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Hong KongLaotian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Fair
94.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Average
92.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Average
89.3%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Excellent
86.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.0%
Exceptional
68.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Exceptional
62.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.4%
Exceptional
49.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.2%
Exceptional
42.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Exceptional
17.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Laotian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.78%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.9%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Laotian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongLaotian
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.9%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Excellent
2.4%