Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Belize Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,705,084 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belize within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.153. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Belize. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 4.8 Immigrants from Belize.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $83,141, a difference of 54.1%), median family income ($131,067 compared to $89,197, a difference of 46.9%), and per capita income ($56,709 compared to $38,614, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 20.1%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $51,223, a difference of 21.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $53,665, a difference of 33.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 67.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 67.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 13.7%), single father poverty (14.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 16.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 49.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 42.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 59.5%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 58.3%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.65%), family households (66.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.39, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 35.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 108.9%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 85.3%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 69.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 44.8%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 32.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (19.9% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 11.9%).