Delaware vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Delaware
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Delaware
Chickasaw
3,204
SOCIAL INDEX
29.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
228th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Delaware Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,725,931 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Delaware communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Delaware within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.040% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Delaware corresponds to a decrease of 40.4 Chickasaw.
Delaware vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Delaware and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,914 compared to $82,193, a difference of 15.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,876 compared to $77,929, a difference of 15.3%), and median household income ($80,527 compared to $70,005, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,159 compared to $44,763, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,214 compared to $53,732, a difference of 8.3%).
Income Metric | Delaware | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,778 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $96,958 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $80,527 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,783 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,412 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,964 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,159 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $89,876 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $94,914 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,214 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Tragic 27.2% |
Delaware vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Delaware and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (9.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 18.1%), single female poverty (22.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 16.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.16%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.3%).
Poverty Metric | Delaware | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Fair 12.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Fair 9.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Poor 11.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.1% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.0% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.4% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.5% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.8% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Delaware vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Delaware and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Delaware | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.4% |
Delaware vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Delaware and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Delaware | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.8% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.2% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.8% | Tragic 79.0% |
Delaware vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Delaware and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 11.5%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.24%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.31%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.63%).
Family Structure Metric | Delaware | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Good 64.6% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.8% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 46.9% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.2% | Tragic 36.3% |
Delaware vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Delaware and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Delaware | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.2% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Delaware vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Delaware and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.7%), bachelor's degree (33.8% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and associate's degree (42.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%).
Education Level Metric | Delaware | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Excellent 93.0% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.2% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.5% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.3% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.8% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Delaware vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Delaware and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 26.7%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.5%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.2%).
Disability Metric | Delaware | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.5% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.4% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.9% |