Immigrants from Hong Kong vs African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 237,750,273 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Africans within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.620. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.122% in Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 121.6 Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and African communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $78,986, a difference of 62.2%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $72,650, a difference of 53.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($127,500 compared to $84,925, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 11.3%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $46,838, a difference of 32.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $53,711, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and African communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 83.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 78.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 77.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 5.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 58.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 44.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 24.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 69.1%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 68.4%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.15%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (66.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.9%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and African communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 76.9%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 74.6%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 9th grade (94.1% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and 5th grade (96.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 65.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 51.2%), and disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 5.1%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 14.5%).