Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Chinese
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,108,979 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.051. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 16.6 Chinese.
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $56,872, a difference of 23.3%), per capita income ($56,709 compared to $46,098, a difference of 23.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $104,264, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $58,162, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $77,465, a difference of 8.2%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $56,709 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $131,067 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $111,519 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $59,433 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $70,146 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $49,818 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $62,083 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $128,140 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $127,500 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $71,567 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.5% | Average 25.9% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 41.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 32.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), single mother poverty (24.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.5% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 12.4% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.5% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.2% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.4% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 29.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Chinese |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.4% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 26.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.4% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 30.5% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.6% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 28.3%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple households (49.6% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.1% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.5% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.6% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.9% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 23.6% | Excellent 30.2% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 37.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 36.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 24.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.3% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.7% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.6% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.2% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 83.5%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 57.2%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.3% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.0% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.4% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.2% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.5% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.4% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.8% | Fair 1.8% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 38.3%), male disability (9.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 28.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.59%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.5%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 10.6% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.95% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 19.9% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |