Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Good
Exceptional
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,463,347 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 3.6 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $97,880, a difference of 30.9%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $89,496, a difference of 24.6%), and median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $57,352, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 0.76%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $63,643, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $51,914, a difference of 19.6%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$56,709
Exceptional
$47,394
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$131,067
Exceptional
$108,830
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$111,519
Exceptional
$89,496
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,433
Exceptional
$48,913
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$70,146
Exceptional
$57,352
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,818
Exceptional
$41,527
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$62,083
Fair
$51,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,140
Excellent
$97,880
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$127,500
Exceptional
$104,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,567
Exceptional
$63,643
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.5%
Good
25.3%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 27.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 23.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 7.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.4%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.5%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.4%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.9%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 24.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Zimbabwe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.4%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.5%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.6%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
83.4%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 28.7%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.5%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (66.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 4.2%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.6%
Excellent
30.3%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.28%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.7%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.6%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.2%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Poor
6.0%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 44.9%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.0%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.21%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.84%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.85%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Average
89.3%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.0%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.4%
Exceptional
50.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.2%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 29.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.5%), ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.2%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.9%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%