Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Yup'ik
Chickasaw
2,388
SOCIAL INDEX
21.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
262nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Yup'ik Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,500,772 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Yup'ik communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.990. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yup'ik within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yup'ik corresponds to an increase of 17.5 Chickasaw.
Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,732 compared to $44,763, a difference of 22.3%), median male earnings ($39,504 compared to $47,832, a difference of 21.1%), and per capita income ($30,518 compared to $36,475, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($69,695 compared to $70,005, a difference of 0.45%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($81,000 compared to $82,193, a difference of 1.5%), and median female earnings ($32,730 compared to $34,414, a difference of 5.1%).
Income Metric | Yup'ik | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,518 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $79,290 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,695 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $35,942 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $39,504 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $32,730 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,732 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $73,688 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $81,000 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,727 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 27.2% |
Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (32.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 149.5%), married-couple family poverty (13.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 131.2%), and single male poverty (31.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 93.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (26.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother poverty (32.5% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (27.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 10.4%).
Poverty Metric | Yup'ik | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 24.3% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.7% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 25.1% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 24.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 25.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.6% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 32.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.5% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.1% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 32.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (16.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 217.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (18.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 197.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (14.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 193.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 73.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (9.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 100.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 105.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Yup'ik | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 16.4% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 10.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 23.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 41.0% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 20.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 17.9% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 13.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 21.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.0% | Good 5.4% |
Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (73.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (76.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.7% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Yup'ik | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.7% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 73.2% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.3% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 70.9% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 73.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 76.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.6% | Tragic 79.0% |
Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (5.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 95.6%), births to unmarried women (56.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 55.5%), and single mother households (10.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 4.2%), family households (72.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 12.5%), and currently married (39.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 16.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Yup'ik | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 72.4% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 37.0% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.1% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 4.00 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 39.9% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 56.4% | Tragic 36.3% |
Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (45.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 484.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (34.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 68.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 49.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 57.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Yup'ik | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 45.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 58.4% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 34.9% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (19.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 56.6%), associate's degree (25.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 54.7%), and no schooling completed (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.2% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.33%), 5th grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and 6th grade (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.39%).
Education Level Metric | Yup'ik | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 99.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 99.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 99.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 99.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.6% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.1% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 45.8% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 39.4% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 25.0% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 19.4% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (4.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 160.0%), ambulatory disability (5.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 55.8%), and self-care disability (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.2%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.8%).
Disability Metric | Yup'ik | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 37.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 61.1% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.9% |