Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chilean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Chileans

Good
Excellent
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chilean Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,744,435 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.051. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 3.3 Chileans.
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Chilean Communities

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chilean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $99,900, a difference of 28.3%), median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $56,973, a difference of 23.1%), and median household income ($111,519 compared to $90,605, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $63,957, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $53,185, a difference of 16.7%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chilean Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Hong KongChilean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$56,709
Exceptional
$46,459
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$131,067
Exceptional
$108,429
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$111,519
Exceptional
$90,605
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,433
Exceptional
$48,504
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$70,146
Exceptional
$56,973
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,818
Exceptional
$40,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$62,083
Exceptional
$53,185
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,140
Exceptional
$99,900
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$127,500
Exceptional
$106,611
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,567
Exceptional
$63,957
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.5%
Fair
26.3%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chilean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 25.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 23.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.86%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chilean Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Hong KongChilean
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.5%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.4%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Excellent
11.0%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chilean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.080%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.42%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chilean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Hong KongChilean
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.2%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.3%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chilean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.38%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chilean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Hong KongChilean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.4%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.5%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.6%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
83.4%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chilean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 30.1%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.8%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.88%), family households (66.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chilean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Hong KongChilean
Family Households
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.6%
Good
30.7%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chilean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongChilean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Good
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.6%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.2%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Good
6.4%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chilean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.5%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.9%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.37%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.42%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chilean Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Hong KongChilean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Average
89.3%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.0%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.4%
Exceptional
49.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.2%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Exceptional
16.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chilean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 35.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.010%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.2%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chilean Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongChilean
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.9%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%