Venezuelan vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Venezuelan
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Venezuelans
Chickasaw
6,739
SOCIAL INDEX
64.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
144th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Venezuelan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,887,488 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Venezuelan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.100. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Venezuelans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Venezuelans corresponds to a decrease of 3.0 Chickasaw.
Venezuelan vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($82,432 compared to $70,005, a difference of 17.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,460 compared to $82,193, a difference of 17.4%), and per capita income ($42,074 compared to $36,475, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income over 65 years ($58,026 compared to $53,732, a difference of 8.0%), and median female earnings ($37,282 compared to $34,414, a difference of 8.3%).
Income Metric | Venezuelan | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Poor $42,074 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $96,281 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,432 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,580 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,510 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,282 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,011 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $88,232 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,460 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,026 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Tragic 27.2% |
Venezuelan vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.7% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 38.3%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 31.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.45%), receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 14.1%).
Poverty Metric | Venezuelan | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Average 12.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Fair 9.3% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Average 13.5% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.7% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.8% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.6% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.4% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.4% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.5% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Venezuelan vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Venezuelan | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.5% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.1% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Good 5.4% |
Venezuelan vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Venezuelan | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.3% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.0% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.0% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.3% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Average 84.4% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Tragic 79.0% |
Venezuelan vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.8%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 14.6%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (66.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Venezuelan | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.4% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.6% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Excellent 2.3% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.7% | Tragic 36.3% |
Venezuelan vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 39.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 23.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.38%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Venezuelan | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.1% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Venezuelan vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 46.6%), master's degree (15.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 39.1%), and bachelor's degree (40.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.9% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
Education Level Metric | Venezuelan | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 2.0% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Average 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.7% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.7% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.3% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.5% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Excellent 15.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Poor 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Venezuelan vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 71.2%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 69.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.2%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 26.1%).
Disability Metric | Venezuelan | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.9% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |