Burmese vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Burmese
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Burmese
Chickasaw
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Burmese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,261,834 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 1.5 Chickasaw.
Burmese vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $82,193, a difference of 47.8%), median household income ($103,145 compared to $70,005, a difference of 47.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $77,929, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $44,763, a difference of 22.4%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $34,414, a difference of 30.5%).
Income Metric | Burmese | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,005 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $123,369 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $103,145 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $54,559 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $65,236 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $44,911 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,800 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $113,701 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $121,444 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $71,139 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Tragic 27.2% |
Burmese vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 65.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 52.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.35%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 22.6%).
Poverty Metric | Burmese | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.9% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.0% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.3% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.2% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Burmese vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 38.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Burmese | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.4% |
Burmese vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Burmese | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.5% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.6% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Tragic 79.0% |
Burmese vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 37.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 35.3%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.90%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.98%), and family households (65.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Burmese | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.8% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.22 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.9% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.4% | Tragic 36.3% |
Burmese vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Burmese | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.6% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Burmese vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 82.8%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 74.6%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 72.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.31%).
Education Level Metric | Burmese | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Excellent 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Excellent 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Excellent 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.8% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.3% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.9% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.7% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 54.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.9% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Burmese vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 74.9%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 71.9%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.0%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.5%).
Disability Metric | Burmese | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.6% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.9% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |