Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 161,463,031 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.176. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 9.3 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $97,159, a difference of 31.9%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $88,388, a difference of 26.2%), and median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $55,954, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 0.73%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $62,354, a difference of 14.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $52,440, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 32.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 30.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and single father poverty (14.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 23.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.60%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.97%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 32.3%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.3%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.40%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.69%), and family households (66.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.37%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.8%), no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.2%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.12%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 35.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.0%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.96%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.6%).