Inupiat vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Inupiat
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Inupiat
Chickasaw
2,695
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
244th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Inupiat Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,477,768 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Inupiat communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Inupiat within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Inupiat corresponds to an increase of 26.5 Chickasaw.
Inupiat vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 30.8%), householder income under 25 years ($55,935 compared to $44,763, a difference of 25.0%), and median female earnings ($40,080 compared to $34,414, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,281 compared to $47,832, a difference of 1.2%), per capita income ($36,999 compared to $36,475, a difference of 1.4%), and median earnings ($43,000 compared to $40,672, a difference of 5.7%).
Income Metric | Inupiat | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,999 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,730 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $78,841 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,000 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,281 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,080 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,935 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,619 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $91,355 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,061 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 20.8% | Tragic 27.2% |
Inupiat vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 53.1%), married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.4%), and single male poverty (20.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.92%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty (16.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Poverty Metric | Inupiat | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.6% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.0% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Good 29.0% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.6% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 20.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Inupiat vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (12.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 133.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (9.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 121.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (9.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 116.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 32.4%), and female unemployment (8.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 59.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Inupiat | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 8.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 28.1% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 20.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 13.4% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 9.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.6% | Good 5.4% |
Inupiat vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.23%).
Labor Participation Metric | Inupiat | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.3% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.1% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.0% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 79.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.9% | Tragic 79.0% |
Inupiat vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 76.7%), births to unmarried women (52.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 43.6%), and divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 5.2%), married-couple households (42.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and currently married (41.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 12.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Inupiat | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.8% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 32.8% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.4% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.63 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.3% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 52.1% | Tragic 36.3% |
Inupiat vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 280.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 38.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (71.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 29.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 31.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Inupiat | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 29.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 71.5% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 42.6% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Inupiat vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (32.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 18.6%), bachelor's degree (25.8% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.5% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.090%), 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
Education Level Metric | Inupiat | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.1% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 54.6% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 47.2% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 32.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 25.8% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Inupiat vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (3.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 113.2%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 43.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.3%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age over 75 (58.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 14.1%).
Disability Metric | Inupiat | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.7% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 34.5% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 58.4% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |