Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Arab Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 248,658,061 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Arabs within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.285. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.102% in Arabs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 102.3 Arabs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Arab communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $97,336, a difference of 31.7%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $88,398, a difference of 26.2%), and per capita income ($56,709 compared to $45,662, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 4.2%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $62,266, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $51,219, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Arab communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 40.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 37.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and single father poverty (14.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Arab communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 29.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Arab communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 20.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Arab communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.6%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.87%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (66.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Arab communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.96%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Arab communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 32.5%), no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.6%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.34%), ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Arab communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 33.2%), disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 28.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.1%).