Cape Verdean vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cape Verdean
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cape Verdeans
Chickasaw
1,263
SOCIAL INDEX
10.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
317th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Cape Verdean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,378,286 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Cape Verdean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cape Verdeans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cape Verdeans corresponds to a decrease of 12.8 Chickasaw.
Cape Verdean vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 15.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $44,763, a difference of 14.8%), and median female earnings ($38,614 compared to $34,414, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,580 compared to $82,193, a difference of 6.6%), median male earnings ($51,103 compared to $47,832, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,077 compared to $53,732, a difference of 7.3%).
Income Metric | Cape Verdean | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,935 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,848 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,848 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,640 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,103 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,614 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,387 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $85,758 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,580 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,077 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.6% | Tragic 27.2% |
Cape Verdean vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 60.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 44.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.89%), female poverty (15.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 2.2%).
Poverty Metric | Cape Verdean | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.1% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.3% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.7% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdean vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 55.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 50.7%), and male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Cape Verdean | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.0% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.4% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.4% |
Cape Verdean vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.8% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cape Verdean | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.6% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.0% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 44.5% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.3% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Tragic 79.0% |
Cape Verdean vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.7%), married-couple households (38.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 20.4%), and currently married (39.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.63%), family households (61.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Cape Verdean | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 61.8% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 38.1% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.17 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 39.6% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 41.3% | Tragic 36.3% |
Cape Verdean vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 98.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 69.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 9.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (46.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 26.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 48.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cape Verdean | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.5% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 46.8% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Cape Verdean vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 83.0%), college, under 1 year (56.0% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and college, 1 year or more (50.3% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 0.010%), associate's degree (38.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Education Level Metric | Cape Verdean | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.8% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.1% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.4% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.0% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.3% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.9% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Cape Verdean vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 42.9%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and cognitive disability (19.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.9%).
Disability Metric | Cape Verdean | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.1% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.9% |