Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 241,424,634 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.363. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.111% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 110.6 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $99,429, a difference of 28.9%), per capita income ($56,709 compared to $44,362, a difference of 27.8%), and median household income ($111,519 compared to $88,976, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.2%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $54,436, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $61,440, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 34.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 32.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 38.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 36.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 31.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 43.5%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 35.0%), and single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.35%), family households (66.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 31.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 58.4%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 57.7%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.25%), 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and 9th grade (94.1% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 70.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 45.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.9%).