Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,770,522 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 5.6 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $82,331, a difference of 55.6%), per capita income ($56,709 compared to $37,766, a difference of 50.2%), and median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $46,736, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 12.9%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $51,525, a difference of 20.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $54,526, a difference of 31.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 74.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 74.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 73.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 15.1%), single father poverty (14.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 16.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 49.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 34.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 61.8%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 58.5%), and births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 57.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.40, a difference of 4.5%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.47%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 96.6%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 84.8%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 74.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.81%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 42.3%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 30.0%), and disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.5%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.6%).