Navajo vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Navajo
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Navajo
Chickasaw
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Navajo Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,170,121 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.678. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to an increase of 3.9 Chickasaw.
Navajo vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $36,475, a difference of 25.6%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 21.5%), and median family income ($70,989 compared to $85,356, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $34,414, a difference of 4.1%), householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $44,763, a difference of 5.6%), and median earnings ($36,999 compared to $40,672, a difference of 9.9%).
Income Metric | Navajo | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $29,031 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $70,989 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $59,159 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,999 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,098 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,046 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $42,380 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $66,529 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $69,759 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $47,722 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 27.2% |
Navajo vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 104.7%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 73.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 66.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 16.8%), single female poverty (31.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 20.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 23.8%).
Poverty Metric | Navajo | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 22.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 23.3% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 30.5% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 31.7% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 29.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 40.2% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 17.5% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Navajo vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 90.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 89.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 80.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 40.4%), and female unemployment (7.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 42.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Navajo | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 9.8% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 7.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 12.2% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 10.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.2% | Good 5.4% |
Navajo vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (73.8% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 9.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Navajo | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 56.6% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.2% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 32.1% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 64.8% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 73.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 73.8% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 79.0% |
Navajo vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 41.9%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.6%), and currently married (39.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.1%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and average family size (3.65 compared to 3.19, a difference of 14.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Navajo | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.4% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 40.1% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.65 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 39.0% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 36.3% |
Navajo vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.45%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 6.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Navajo | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.8% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.3% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.3% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Navajo vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 28.7%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 25.7%), and master's degree (9.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.41%).
Education Level Metric | Navajo | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Fair 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Poor 95.8% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.0% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.1% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.2% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.3% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.8% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 32.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Navajo vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 25.7%), disability age over 75 (58.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
Disability Metric | Navajo | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 33.3% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 58.3% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.6% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.9% |