Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bahamas
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Bahamas
Chickasaw
1,107
SOCIAL INDEX
8.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
322nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Bahamas Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,084,570 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Bahamas communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.123. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bahamas within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.045% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bahamas corresponds to a decrease of 44.7 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 29.0%), median male earnings ($45,176 compared to $47,832, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,793 compared to $44,763, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($84,732 compared to $85,356, a difference of 0.74%), householder income over 65 years ($53,174 compared to $53,732, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,177 compared to $82,193, a difference of 1.2%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Bahamas | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,193 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,732 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $71,349 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,861 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $45,176 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,027 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,793 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $76,910 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,177 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,174 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 24.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 22.1%), and receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), poverty (14.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.97%), and female poverty (16.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Bahamas | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.4% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.4% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.5% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.1% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.0% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Bahamas | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Bahamas | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.0% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.2% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.5% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.2% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and currently married (41.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.2%), divorced or separated (13.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Bahamas | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 63.6% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.7% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.27 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.9% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 40.1% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 41.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 27.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Bahamas | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.5% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 31.9%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.2% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.090%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and ged/equivalency (84.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.41%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Bahamas | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Poor 97.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.2% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.1% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.2% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.1% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.3% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 54.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 39.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.6%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Bahamas | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Average 6.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.7% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.7% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |