Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina

Good
Average
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,212
SOCIAL INDEX
59.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
160th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,181,361 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.091. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 9.2 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Communities

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $88,819, a difference of 44.3%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $79,888, a difference of 39.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($127,500 compared to $94,288, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 2.8%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $50,565, a difference of 22.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $55,986, a difference of 27.8%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$56,709
Poor
$42,278
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$131,067
Tragic
$97,432
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$111,519
Tragic
$79,888
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,433
Fair
$45,600
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$70,146
Poor
$52,869
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,818
Poor
$38,886
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$62,083
Tragic
$50,565
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,140
Tragic
$88,819
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$127,500
Tragic
$94,288
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,567
Tragic
$55,986
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.5%
Exceptional
24.8%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 40.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 36.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%), single father poverty (14.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.7%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Good
12.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Excellent
8.4%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Good
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
13.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.5%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Average
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Fair
17.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Fair
16.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.5%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.4%
Average
29.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Good
11.3%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Exceptional
15.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.6%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.0%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 37.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.33%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
66.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.4%
Exceptional
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.5%
Exceptional
41.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.6%
Exceptional
78.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
86.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
83.3%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 31.3%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 28.7%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.6%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.15, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (48.9% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 6.1%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Family Households
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
61.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Tragic
44.4%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Average
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Fair
46.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.6%
Excellent
30.3%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.5%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 9.3%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Good
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
53.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.2%
Tragic
17.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
5.3%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 65.9%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 60.2%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.42%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.63%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Fair
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Excellent
94.2%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Excellent
93.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Average
89.3%
Excellent
89.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Good
86.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.0%
Average
65.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Average
59.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.4%
Average
46.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.2%
Average
37.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Fair
14.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
1.7%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 39.2%), disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 32.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.71%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.8%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Exceptional
10.6%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.2%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.9%
Average
23.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Average
2.5%