Carpatho Rusyn vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Chickasaw
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Carpatho Rusyn Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,614,866 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.406. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.403% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to an increase of 403.5 Chickasaw.
Carpatho Rusyn vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,248 compared to $36,475, a difference of 29.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,449 compared to $77,929, a difference of 27.6%), and median family income ($107,502 compared to $85,356, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.38%), householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $44,763, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,093 compared to $53,732, a difference of 13.7%).
Income Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,248 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $107,502 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,635 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,617 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,572 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,825 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,113 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,449 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,777 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,093 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Tragic 27.2% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 47.0%), family poverty (7.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 43.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.3%), single father poverty (18.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.7%).
Poverty Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.5% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.5% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.1% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 13.1% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 31.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 16.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.97%).
Unemployment Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Good 5.4% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.0% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.8% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 87.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.2%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.4%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.44%), currently married (47.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.97%), and average family size (3.06 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 61.1% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Poor 45.7% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.06 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.9% | Tragic 36.3% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 35.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 34.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 23.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Fair 10.7% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Fair 89.5% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 56.8%), master's degree (17.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 53.3%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%).
Education Level Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.4% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.9% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.1% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 53.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 40.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 14.3%).
Disability Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.6% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 44.8% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |